Gabe Bullard | Is On The Internet

About Walter Cronkite

I wasn’t alive for any of Cronkite’s evening broadcasts, but I did study him a lot in school. I think that makes me unqualified to say much about him. I love Cronkite’s work, and I’ll leave more meaningful remembrances to more competent writers. They’re going on now about how there will never be another Cronkite. That no one will trust a single newsman anymore, not after the politicization of networks and the fragmentation of media (TV, radio, newspapers, the web). I suppose it is true that there won’t be another Cronkite because Cronkite was the result of a fairly new medium and a cultural landscape that probably won’t come around again. That’s not necessarily bad. Things change. It’s sad that Cronkite is gone, but maybe instead of using his passing as a metaphor for the death of the news we should look back at all of the network frustrations he faced in the 80s and how quickly he became a name to drop instead of a legacy for subsequent broadcasters.

Comment Pages

There are 1 Comments to "About Walter Cronkite"

  • Matt Hurst says:

    I think it’s great that Cronkite found work to contribute until the very end, leaving a true legacy with his imprint on the medium. Of course I don’t remember this much nostalgia around Murrow until maybe the last decade, but then again he died before either of us had been born.

    What do you think, besides the impression on this one generation, Cronkite’s legacy will have been if not for the 1980s?

Write a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

...oh mercy